
Why Transparency Matters in Laser Treatments: What Patients Deserve to Know
- Ashley Serveta, CME, LSO, CHHP

- Aug 16
- 3 min read
When it comes to medical aesthetics, lasers are powerful tools that can transform skin health and appearance. But with that power comes responsibility. Patients deserve to know exactly what device is being used on their skin, who manufactured it, and whether it is FDA-cleared for its intended use.
Unfortunately, not every clinic or franchise provides this level of transparency — and that’s where questions naturally arise.
The Importance of Device Transparency
Every laser treatment should come with clarity. When a provider openly shares the make and model of their device, it allows patients to:
✅ Verify FDA clearance for safety and specific uses (such as skin rejuvenation, pigmentation, or hair removal).
✅ Research the clinical track record of that technology, including published studies and long-term outcomes.
✅ Confirm operator training, since reputable manufacturers provide thorough education and certification.
This transparency not only builds trust — it empowers patients to make informed decisions about their health and beauty.
Franchise Models and Limited Disclosure
In recent years, large franchise-style chains have grown popular for offering quick, accessible treatments.
One well-known example is Skin Laundry, which offers its Signature Laser Facial.
The treatment is described as a non-ablative laser facial designed to penetrate beneath the skin’s surface without damaging the outer layer.
Independent media outlets have reported that it likely uses a long-pulse Nd:YAG laser — a category of device that is safe, well-established, and clinically credible.
However, the franchise does not disclose the specific make or model of the laser used.
This approach isn’t unique to Skin Laundry — many franchise clinics choose to highlight the experience and results rather than the equipment itself.
The challenge is that when patients cannot verify which device is being used, it naturally raises questions:
Is the device FDA-cleared, and for which indications?
Is it a gold-standard platform from a leading manufacturer (such as Candela, Cutera, Cynosure, or Lumenis)?
What training protocols are in place for providers?
Without those answers, patients are left to rely solely on marketing language rather than transparent facts.
How Dermatology Practices Differ
By contrast, physician-owned dermatology and medical aesthetics practices typically do disclose their devices.
For example, a reputable practice may proudly state:
“We use the Candela GentleYAG Pro for skin rejuvenation.”
“We perform pigmentation treatments with the Cutera Excel V+.”
This not only demonstrates integrity but also reassures patients that the devices are well-known, FDA-cleared, and backed by extensive clinical data.
The Takeaway: Transparency Builds Trust
Whether you’re visiting a boutique medical spa, a large franchise, or a dermatologist’s office, remember:
You have the right to know the make and model of the device being used on your skin.
Transparency fosters confidence, strengthens trust, and protects patient safety. When that information isn’t provided, it doesn’t necessarily mean the treatment is unsafe — but it does make it harder for patients to feel fully informed.
Asking the right questions ensures you’re not just choosing a treatment — you’re choosing peace of mind.
✔️ Three Questions to Ask Before Any Laser Treatment
🔹 What is the make and model of the laser you’re using?
Knowing this allows you to research the device and confirm it is FDA-cleared.
🔹 What conditions is this device FDA-cleared to treat?
Different lasers are approved for different uses (e.g., pigmentation, vascular lesions, hair removal).
🔹 What training do providers receive to operate this laser?
Proper education and certification are essential for both safety and results.
Pro Tip: A trustworthy provider will answer these questions openly and confidently. Transparency is a sign of integrity — and your skin deserves nothing less.



































Comments